[aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgWed Dec 8 22:51:08 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That's just one more thing to add to the channel utilization (assuming it only has an RF link), and one more thing that needs to be secured against spoofing. Not to mention added hardware cost to have a real-time clock. You can run a tracker off a 0.5% tolerance ceramic resonator, but it stinks for telling time. Scott N1VG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark A. Lewis" <mark at siliconjunkie.net> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:46 PM Subject: RE: [aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS > I've used these too. It requires fairly close time synchronization, and if you're dealing with a device somewhere on a > mountaintop miles away with no GPS, keeping within a couple of minutes is too much trouble. Ever heard of NTP? _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Authentication over APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
