[aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
Neville A. Cross nacross at gmail.comTue Dec 14 16:23:10 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jason, English is not my fisrt languaje. Also I am quite new to APRS. When it comes to acronims I am really bad. Can you please tell me what HAAT means? If HAAT need some calculations, can you please explain it to me? Neville YN1V On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:51:00 -0600, Jason Winningham <jdw at eng.uah.edu> wrote: > I should have said HAAT instead of height, since that's what I meant. > And yes, the APRS spec clearly states height is HAAT, not above ground > level or above sea level. > > Some googling suggests that the tallest towers in the world (that is, > distance to the top of the actual tower structure above the ground it > is built on) are less than 2000ft tall. > > I guess my next step is to perform some HAAT calculations for my own > education. > > -Jason > kg4wsv > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
