[aprssig] BIG-TALL digis that hear FAR too MUCH!
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Dec 14 17:53:07 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] BIG-TALL digis that hear FAR too MUCH!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> Sean Jewett <sean at rimboy.com> 12/14/04 11:43:59 AM >>> >> BIG digi to UHF, I am not proposing a common UHF freq. IN >> fact, the opposite. It should be a locally coordinated >> packet frequency ... > >I'm not saying we have to share it. I'm saying, I and I think a >few others would like some pointers on some good freqs to use. That should be easy. Back in the packet boon of the early 90's most freq coordinators set aside many freqs just for packet, and many of them were never used or have become dormant. Simply check your local coordinators lists, contact the people listed for a packet freq and ask them if you could use it for this packet application... Bob We'd like to have some ground to stand on if there are problems in terms of coordination or other reasons to QSY. I'd rather not step on any toes doing something like this, giving us some pointers (ie, APRS-WG or with help from ARRL) would be appreciated. Again, I don't want to set this up only to find we're going to have to QSY because we're stepping on someone or it's decided that there should be an UHF equiv of 144.39 and then everyone has to QSY. I understand what you're saying. I'm saying, I won't move forward until we have some solid ideas on good freqs to use. Sean... -- The punk rock will get you if the government don't get you first. --Old 97's _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ KG4NRC http://www.rimboy.com Your source for the crap you know you need.
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] BIG-TALL digis that hear FAR too MUCH!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
