[aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
Daron J. Wilson daron at wilson.orgTue Dec 14 18:11:17 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I sure that this same situation is found in a lot of locations around the > West, and other parts of the world as well. Who wouldn't want to put a digi > on a mountaintop? We have several mountain top digis, the problem is that they hear SO much out of the area traffic that they have a hard time hearing local traffic. We're now 'filling in' with lower level machines that act as relays to get local data to the mountaintop and around the local area. Our 3100' digi routinely hauls in stuff from 200+ miles away, far more than we need or want. Listening to the amount of data up there at even that altitude it is almost a continuous string. Until the network progresses to a backbone on another frequency we are stuck sharing, but having one on a high mountaintop does not (by default) make it the best choice. 73 N7HQR at OCRG.ORG Daron J. Wilson, RCDD ) ) Telecom Manager ( ( LH Morris Electric, Inc. ) ) (541) 265-8067 office _|****| mmm! (541) 265-7652 fax ( | | coffee! (541) 270-5886 cellular \| | daron.wilson at lhmorris.com |____|
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
