[aprssig] Re: Calculating HAAT(was lots of big towers?etc)
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Dec 14 20:26:45 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] SSn-N and LINKn-N vs WIDEn-N Problems?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> jfkraus3 at cox.net 12/14/04 3:12:42 PM >>> >>On a topographic map, plot concentric circles centered on your tower >>location. > >How far out are the circles? 1ft 1mi 100mi? It will affect the calculation. The official HAAT required by the FCC on formal submissions is out to 10 miles, but again, if the digi is so high that it can see out to 80 miles, then it is the ground out about 50 miles that will have the greatest impact on actual range, and not the initial 10 miles which might still be on the same mountain. So common sense should really be the factor based on what the area is. Taking average levels out 100 miles would not make sense since the signal wont get that far, and taking them at 5 miles for a digi that is at 10,000 feet wont make much sense either. Unless of course you put it in the middle of a FLAT top mountain that is 10 miles across then the average terrrain that will block the signal before it gets to the valley IS only 5 miles... Again, common sense must be applied. The FCC equation is good for getting "consistent" results for their data base, but getting a value that matches your real-world situation is a horse of a different color. Also, if the area towards 90% of your users is east, and no one lives to the west, then use the average terrain in the direction of most use... etc... Bob. _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] SSn-N and LINKn-N vs WIDEn-N Problems?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
