[aprssig] SSn-N and LINKn-N vs WIDEn-N Problems?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Dec 14 20:46:43 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Calculating HAAT(was lots of big towers?etc)
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: 30 meters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The proposal for SSn-N and ##LNKn-N to replace WIDEn-N in those areas that are saturated has not generated the usual opposition. If there is a problem in there, we need to dig it out and discuss it. If its a good idea, lets do it. Can someone take the Internet feed and simply plot a 3D map of the USA showing APRS station density in stations per hundred square miles? It would be very easy to see what areas should be WIDEn-N. Or maybe better to plot APRS station density per DIGI! to get the best idea of network load density. I'd be curious to know what vast areas should remain WIDEn-N out west mostly, and what areas will go with the State SSn-N. My thinnking is that everything east of the Mississippi is a candidate for SSn-N. As is everything along the West Coast. In the Rockies and great plaines are good candidates for WIDEn-N..? But the interstate ##LNKn-N's can work everywhere? de Wb4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Calculating HAAT(was lots of big towers?etc)
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: 30 meters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
