[aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
Tate KC7ZRU kc7zru at arrl.netWed Dec 15 03:48:14 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Calculating HAAT(was lots of big towers?etc)
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason Winningham wrote: | | HAAT is Height Above Average Terrain, and there is a specific formula | that goes like this: | While nothing wrong at all with Jason's formula - great for manual calculating - I found it MUCH easier for this math challenged operator to use VE2DBE's Radio Mobile software instead: http://www.cplus.org/rmw/english1.html It not only graphicly displays coverage areas, but does HAAT calculations. There're links on his site to get the Shuttle Radar data sets. About as good as it gets. 73 - -- Tate KC7ZRU http://kc7zru.net GPG Public key available at http://kc7zru.net/kc7zru.pub . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBv7P9BWMVStWtSY4RAkZgAJ9C6Ck/k/Q5Ileh+dH10hRR9KeMQACglXcc BaWMF1ZS8CUPv1PE/6QsTJg= =iZh3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Calculating HAAT(was lots of big towers?etc)
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
