[aprssig] FCC's Calculation of HAAT
Chris Rose kb8uih at sbcglobal.netWed Dec 15 23:35:54 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] FCC's Calculation of HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks Eric. Chris KB8UIH --- "Eric H. Christensen" <kf4otn at earthlink.net> wrote: > § 24.53 Calculation of height above average terrain > (HAAT). > (a) HAAT is determined by subtracting average > terrain elevation from > antenna height above mean sea level. > (b) Average terrain elevation shall be calculated > using elevation > data from a 30 arc second or better Digital > Elevation > Models (DEMs). DEM data is available from United > States Geological > Survey (USGS). The data file shall be identified. If > 30 arc second > data is used, the elevation data must be processed > for intermediate > points using interpolation techniques; otherwise, > the nearest point > may be used. If DEM data is not available, elevation > data from the > Defense Mapping Agencys Digital Chart of the World > (DCW) may be > used. > (c) Radial average terrain elevation is calculated > as the average of > the elevation along a straight line path from > 3 to 16 kilometers extending radially from the > antenna site. At least > 50 evenly spaced data points for each radial > shall be used in the computation. > (d) Average terrain elevation is the average of the > eight radial > average terrain elevations (for the eight cardinal > radials). > (e) The position location of the antenna site shall > be determined to > an accuracy of no less than ±5 meters in both the > horizontal > (latitude and longitude) and vertical (ground > elevation) dimensions > with respect to the National Geodetic Reference > System. > > > 73s, > Eric KF4OTN > kf4otn at amsat.org > http://www.ericsatcom.net > > Project OSCAR Member > AMSAT-NA Member: 35360 > AMSAT Eastern North Carolina Area Coordinator > > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of > Chris Rose > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 17:56 > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big > towers? > > > I would still ask exactly what is average terrain? > > Is it the spot of ground the tower sits on or is it > something else? > > If a small mountain say 5k high sits in the middle > of > a plain somewhere, from where is the average terrain > found? > > The base of the tower or the flat land at the base > of > the mountain? > > Chris > KB8UIH > > --- Steve Dimse <k4hg at tapr.org> wrote: > > > On 12/14/04 at 9:38 AM Gerry Creager n5jxs > <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> > > > sent: > > > > >Height Above Ground at the tower base. So: > What's > > the Height Above > > >Average Terrain? That is, in my opinion, the > > height that should be > > >advertised. > > > > > Not just an opinion, the spec is very clear on the > > fact that the H in PHG is > > above average terrain... > > > > Steve K4HG > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] FCC's Calculation of HAAT
- Next message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
