[aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
Steve Dimse k4hg at tapr.orgWed Dec 15 23:53:01 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] FCC's Calculation of HAAT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/15/04 at 3:34 PM Chris Rose <kb8uih at sbcglobal.net> sent: >I don't want a legal battle. I wish you had posted >the entire example I posed. I thought it was an >intelligent point to make. Sorry it was wasted here. > With the data given, the question could not be answered, so I didn't bother to waste bandwidth reposting your example. HAAT is a technical calculation requiring the averaging of many elevations, in a manner already posted to the SIG. The answer to the question depends on the exact topography of the mountain and the plain. Only the simplest case, a tower (or perhaps a mountian only extending out a mile or so) on an absolutely flat plain can be answered simply (that is the altitude of the plain, since all the points you will be averaging will be the same). Reading the technical procedure given on the sig yesterday (and the more precise FCC procedure repeated now) should make that clear. Sorry you got bent out of shape, I was only trying to point out that the answer to your question had already been given, that the HAAT must be calculated... Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] bad PHG, or lots of big towers?
- Next message: [aprssig] FCC's Calculation of HAAT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
