[aprssig] New n-N and 28 versus 30
John Langtry, VE3NEC ve3nec at sympatico.caTue Dec 21 02:09:17 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N and 28 versus 30
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: New n-N and 28 versus 30
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Bob,
I'm not sure that this is really the way to go (verses
education).
Some thoughts leap to mind.
1) I believe that Marco's code looks for "exact" dups;
which of course a mobile tracker will not give. No
match, and it's repeated.
2) Remember that we have on 32K of RAM to play with, and
a lot of that is gone for the base code, and other buffers;
So, for a busy digipeater, extending the time, may cause
additional grief. (I'll look into this one further, once
the holiday are behind us.) I think it's FIFO, but I'd
like to run some tests before making any statements.
We're also testing our a "LAN" for the big machines in
S. Ontario. We're using "SONT n-n" to see if that improves
things. ("We" being Phil VE3RD and myself, BTW.)
vy 73 de John VE3NEC
905-877-7886
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N and 28 versus 30
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: New n-N and 28 versus 30
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
