[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
jfkraus3 at cox.net
Tue Dec 28 10:22:02 CST 2004
It is amazing how great minds think alike.
I have been working on setting up 10 donated Pentium 130 32mb boxes with
dos based apps. I have APRSDOS and Digi_Ned working but one of the things
I want to get going is F6FBB DOS. I plan to have these available for rapid
deployment with groups around the state once I get this done.
I have often felt that the old BBS is the way to go for messaging in local
disasters and shelter evacuations situations. Once you eliminate the long
range forwarding a BBS can work very well as a place to relay mail to and
from EOC's and Shelters. The star topology is very adaptable within a
Now is there anyone on sig who would be willing to help me overcome the
errors I am getting with F6FBBdos?
Off SIG of course.
At 10:17 AM 12/28/2004, you wrote:
>Bob WB4APR said On 28/12/2004 over on the UI-View list...
> > Now that APRS is getting many new people involved in
> > packet radio, it might be time to revitalize the normal
> > packet BBS node system in support of local CONNECTED
> > packet and computer linking as well.
>(I think his suggestion warrants being made here too.... )
More information about the aprssig