[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
John Kraus jfkraus3 at cox.netTue Dec 28 16:22:02 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Conected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It is amazing how great minds think alike. I have been working on setting up 10 donated Pentium 130 32mb boxes with dos based apps. I have APRSDOS and Digi_Ned working but one of the things I want to get going is F6FBB DOS. I plan to have these available for rapid deployment with groups around the state once I get this done. I have often felt that the old BBS is the way to go for messaging in local disasters and shelter evacuations situations. Once you eliminate the long range forwarding a BBS can work very well as a place to relay mail to and from EOC's and Shelters. The star topology is very adaptable within a limited range. Now is there anyone on sig who would be willing to help me overcome the errors I am getting with F6FBBdos? Off SIG of course. At 10:17 AM 12/28/2004, you wrote: >Bob WB4APR said On 28/12/2004 over on the UI-View list... > > > Now that APRS is getting many new people involved in > > packet radio, it might be time to revitalize the normal > > packet BBS node system in support of local CONNECTED > > packet and computer linking as well. > >(I think his suggestion warrants being made here too.... )
- Previous message: [aprssig] Conected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
