[aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS lewvel-4 node system.
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Dec 28 17:09:17 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>As for unused frequencies, that is a problem on almost every >band in Southern California. It is near impossible to put up a repeater >on 2m, 220, or 440 anymore. Yes, if you look at the digital listings in the MidAtlantic you will find everyone of the 25 to 50 packet channels "assigned" to some BBS or node, but you will also find them almost all DEAD and not in use anymore. So I am not proposing a new freq, but just re-vitalizing what we have. I just have no clue how to find out what is really out there and active. With 100 systems listed in our area from the 1998 list (the last time it was updated), I guess the best thing to do is to just monitor each channel for 15 minuets at a time and see what you capture. If you dont decode anything, then its not local and not going to do one any good anyway... Since typing this, I now have now captured a packet from two systems on 145.05 in my area. Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
