[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Richard Amirault ramirault at erols.comTue Dec 28 18:07:34 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hmmmm ... don't mean to stir up the pot .. but I don't agree that it should necessarily be on another frequency. My station is designed to operate as an emergency BBS, Digi, and KAnode during emergency times (defined as loss of commercial power) It will NOT be an APRS station during those times (the computer will not be powered) Under those circumstances (widespread loss of commercial power) the local APRS network will be a shadow of it's former self (if it is still there at all) Richard Amirault N1JDU Boston, MA, USA Go Fly A Kite ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Bruninga" Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet (snip) > And of course, we dont want any of this on 144.39. We want > a parallel system on another channel. (snip)
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
