[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Dec 28 18:34:29 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Can you talk to a winlink telpac node with no special software? If so, then that is ideal. If not, then that is a significant problem for a come-as-you-are system... >>> spider at rivcom.net 12/28/04 1:19:59 PM >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Kraus" <jfkraus3 at cox.net> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:22 AM Subject: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet > I have often felt that the old BBS is the way to go for messaging in local > disasters and shelter evacuations situations. Once you eliminate the long > range forwarding a BBS can work very well as a place to relay mail to and > from EOC's and Shelters. The star topology is very adaptable within a > limited range. Seriously, you guys need to look into Telpac Nodes, WinLink, etc., if you have not done so. Also keep in mind KPC3'+'s, etc have Pbbs capability built in. They work great in local events without the need for any special software. Jim, WA6OFT _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
