[Possible Spam]Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Spider spider at rivcom.netTue Dec 28 18:54:08 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 6, Issue 23
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu> To: <aprssig at lists.tapr.org>; <spider at rivcom.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:34 AM Subject: [Possible Spam]Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet > Can you talk to a winlink telpac node with no special > software? If so, then that is ideal. If not, then that is a > significant problem for a come-as-you-are system... > Yes....a dumb terminal will work just fine...vt100, etc. Think of Winlink this way..... All a TelPac node is....is a remote port to a BBS. The neat thing is that this BBS has SMTP email capability. And the telnet connection is now backed up to three different BBs's. It really is that simple. Jim
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 6, Issue 23
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
