[aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 6, Issue 23
rwf rwf at bsrg.orgTue Dec 28 18:54:32 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [Possible Spam]Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Would probably be good to meet/consult with the other Digi Operators in the area, since you didn't do this when you put the digi up in the first place. At 01:00 PM 12/22/2004, you wrote: >This is exactly what I've been wanting to make the change to the digi I >run (W4AQL, Georgia Tech). Thanks! However, my digi is in the >semi-unique position of being in Downtown Atlanta, with the infamous >Downtown Connector. That highway there is referred to as I-75, I-85, >and 75/85. > >Is there a general consensus of the group as to what digits should be >set to when they're serving highways that have more than one designator? > I'd be tempted to keep the Wide designation on the digi to service a >larger number of people (both those on 75 and 85 as they run through >town, and I-20 to some extent as well). > >tim > >-- >Tim Cailloux >tim at cailloux.com >W4EGT
- Previous message: [Possible Spam]Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
