[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Spider spider at rivcom.netTue Dec 28 19:04:37 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS lewvel-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: <clayj at nwlink.com> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet The other problem you're going to run into with conventional packet, and for that matter ANY 'messaging' system that doesn't look like Outlook, is that Joe or Susie Shelter Manager is NOT likely to be trained or inclined TO BE trained on something as arcane as a packet BBS. With WinLink, you CAN use Outlook...if you want! And the program Airmail is so very much like Outlook, anyone can use it with a very minimal spot training. I use Airmail.....it's simple and to the point. Jim, WA6OFt
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS lewvel-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
