[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Phillip B. Pacier ad6nh at arrl.netTue Dec 28 19:20:04 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Spider wrote: > > Not true all together, Phil. Ocean going ships use SailMail all the > time without the internet and SailMail is pretty much the same as > WinLink. Although VHF Telpac nodes might use the internet the plan for > my area is to have two or three > telpac Nodes that have different Internet providers. If one fails, > others will work. And if they do not work, The HF nodes all over the > US are there to use. > Also, the same exact TNC running as a TelPac Node can also serve as a > Pbbs when needed. > > As I pointed out, it's an excellant tool to be part of a > communications plan. I would not count on any single method > of communications in a total EMCOMM plan. I was not aware that WinLink utilized HF backbones as well as Internet. That certainly changes my perspecitve on its usefulness! > > Phil, with a TNC and another radio and antenna, you could be up and > running as a TelPac node in no time. It would be a great service for > your local area....you have everything else that is needed and it will > run right along with the APRS server stuff. Consider it! And, worse > case is that it's kind fun to play with. I have TNCs and radios to spare - I thought there was already a WinLink node in the LA Basin here. If not, I wouldn't mind setting one up and exploring its usefulness! 73 Phil - AD6NH
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
