[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
John Kraus jfkraus3 at cox.netTue Dec 28 19:41:36 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, unless you consider Hyperterm "special software". Or the equivalent in other OS's >Can you talk to a winlink telpac node with no special >software? If so, then that is ideal. If not, then that is a >significant problem for a come-as-you-are system... ++++++next response============ There is a system in place, Winlink provides an "internet replacement / alternative backbone" via Pactor I / II / III. Surely the internet is not down worldwide as a result of the Tsunami. It will be interesting to see how much traffic is passed via HF digital modes as a result of the event. I suspect it will be far more than will be passed via APRS in any mode. >Those work great until the Internet goes away. In a serious emergency >such as the one experienced in the Indian Ocean basin, Internet access >would be nearly impossible. It is always desireable to have a system in >place that can operate without the use of a hardline connection >anywhere. The move away from hardline is necessary for speed and >availability, but there will be a disaster in this country some day, >unfortunately, that will wake people up to the necessity of an un-wired >backbone. I have had a TelPac node setup in Macon but I have no other hams in the area who are interested in digital at all. Mention Packet and you get a diatribe about ROSE switches and @#$#$%^%^^&& SYSOPS.
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
