[aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS level-4 node system.
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduTue Dec 28 21:00:06 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS level-4 node system.
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS level-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:36 PM, John Denison wrote: > from a newbie point of view, I wonder why 1200 baud is still being > used. I think the biggest reason is that you can get a data signal into and out of a radio via the audio I/O. A big (the biggest?) component of ham radio is experimentation, and a digital mode that you can build digital hardware for without hacking or building a transceiver is very attractive. The various microcontrollers out there (PIC, Atmel, 68HCxx, TI, etc) that can generate (or decode, or both) the audio with few or no external components gives us a very powerful experimental platform if we can live within that 1200 baud AFSK limit. APRS trackers and weather stations fit wonderfully into that particular niche. A local ham has an Atmel based tracker that will also decode packets. the last I heard he has experimental support for wiggling bits via APRS messages, so his rig can not only send tracking and telemetry data from an amateur balloon experiment, it can provide signals for cutdown mechanisms or experiment control. Not bad for one IC, eh? -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS level-4 node system.
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS level-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
