[aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
Spider spider at rivcom.netWed Dec 29 00:02:03 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS lewvel-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip B. Pacier" <ad6nh at arrl.net> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet > I have TNCs and radios to spare - I thought there was already a WinLink > node in the LA Basin here. If not, I wouldn't mind setting one up and > exploring its usefulness! > > 73 > Phil - AD6NH One node is not enough. In Vegas, for example, I see 4 or 5. If one flakes out for any reason the others may be there to choose from. I am totally opposed to having nearby nodes on the same freq. There is no need in probably most cases. Check it out...you'll enjoy it and it's very useful. Jim, WA6OFT
- Previous message: [aprssig] More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Parallel UHF APRS lewvel-4 node system.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
