[aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet now UPS
Bill Vodall wa7nwp at jnos.orgWed Dec 29 07:37:58 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet now UPS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet now UPS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Bill, are you suggesting this actually WORKS? > I have a 300 watt inverter (500 surge), and it > Draws OVER 30 AMPS. No car alternator will put > Out enough current to keep up with the drain at idle. > Are you willing to put a brick on your gas pedal and > Idle at 3,000 RPM to get enough current? > > I KNOW, I tried it, and within an hour or two my little > 300-watt inverter will kill the battery WHILE THE CAR IS > IDLING! And 300 watts isn't very much to work with. > > For any real extended operation a generator is absolutely > Critical. Depends on how much current you need. I'm planning to keep my laptops, 12v B&W TV, camp lanterns and basic wifi router/modem on line. A full up computer with monitor pulls around 100 W. My minimal setup is much less then that. Some day I'll have some nice generators, until then I have some heavy cables with power pole connectors that reach the driveway. (There - I said it. Started the last power pole thread of the year. Good thing I didn't mention how I put power poles on a 50' AC extension cord. :-) ) Bill
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet now UPS
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on (was) Connected Packet now UPS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
