[aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
Bill Vodall wa7nwp at jnos.orgWed Dec 29 07:44:58 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > No reason they can't be -- specially if running Linux. telpac_node is > > trivial to install and run. It's sitting ready in the background and > > nobody > > knows it's there until it's needed. > > > > http://www.jnos.org/blog/2004_11_01_jnos_archive.html#110140782217158315 > > > > Bill > > Bill, tell me about the Linux Telpac! I have not heard a thing about it. > > Jim Not much more to say beyond the notes on the blog. It's been mentioned a couple time on the wl2kemcomm list. I downloaded the source, compiled it and installed on a couple systems. Both worked fine. (I won't mention the other system where I'm still fighting with the compile...) Bill
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
