[aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
Phillip B. Pacier ad6nh at arrl.netWed Dec 29 19:28:31 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Bruninga wrote: >1) This discussion has nothing to do with APRS!!!!!!!!!!!!! >It is a discussion of what we could also be doing with >AX.25 packet to pass emergency traffic and messages >and emails and files via radio in support of emergencies. > >2) It is physically impossible to do these kinds of things >on APRS over multiple hops on RF. Those that try, not >only fail that mission but also QRM everyone else that >is trying to use APRS for what APRS was designed for! > > Wrong, very wrong! There are little things called IGates. I have much sucess with using them throughout the world. I have had much success with my D7 passing messages back home to So. Cal using nothing more than RELAY,WIDE or WIDE2-2 from many points in the country. I rarely see you mention IGates as a vital part of the network, but they'll be more effective at passing long-distance messages than any LINKn-N setup. 73 Phil - AD6NH
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
