[aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
Phillip B. Pacier ad6nh at arrl.netWed Dec 29 20:58:41 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Next message: [aprssig] So. Cal. Local 9600 baud APRS Testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Bruninga wrote: >Humh, are we using the same language here..? > >But you cannot use them to pass bulk "messages" and >bulk emails and bulk files from RF on 144.39 in typical >busy areas. which is what we are talking about here. > > No, we're not using the same language, and it's probably, as Dick pointed out, that this is the APRS sig. I think the discussions about NetGates and other things non-APRS should be moved to another sig becuase I can't keep it straight. You can't move bulk ANYTHING on 144.39, at least not in So. Cal., so anything co-sharing the channel here is a mute point until we solve the RF loading problem. 73 Phil - AD6NH
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: NetNodes, the future
- Next message: [aprssig] So. Cal. Local 9600 baud APRS Testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
