[aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
Spider spider at rivcom.netThu Dec 30 00:03:36 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Vodall" <wa7nwp at jnos.org> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 11:49 AM Subject: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node > "However, Airmail may be used for VHF/UHF Packet under limited > circumstances. Airmail is required for a radio user to > connect to Winlink 2000 over HF radio. Once connected to a compatible > station, message transfer is completely > automatic. The information on anything WinLink is poor. This is a perfect example. > Looks like it's finally time to check out Airmail since it's a smaller > application then Paclink > and isn't suffering from .NET. > > Thanks... > Bill Yep...It works great on vhf packet. There are some head scratching tricks to learning the difference between "post" and "send" but other than that, it's all automatic and works great! You have to learn that you 'post' a message (like a que) and then you send it. You can post a bunch of messages and then send them all at once! And everything is sent compressed and typical compression is 10 to 40%, depending on the message.....and that is a step in the right direction. If you need help email me off sig or call me. Jim, WA6OFT
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: More thoughts on Connected Packet - telpac_node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
