[aprssig] Re: PL 100
Daron J. Wilson daron at wilson.orgSun Jul 18 23:27:20 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: PL 100
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: PL 100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> And even that doesn't explain why the whole industry uses the term PL for tx > only, and CTCSS for rx only. If I'm transmitting a PL tone, someone else > needs to be receiving a PL tone to use it. But the industry says they > receive CTCSS...meaning PL. Or vice versa. Uh...which whole industry are you referring to? I've been in the 'whole industry' for some time and never seen this. Enlighten me please 73 Daron N7HQR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: PL 100
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: PL 100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
