[aprssig] Path Precedence
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Jul 24 23:59:03 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Fixing HID problems on APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: NO-45
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
NEVER EVER send a packet with RELAY in any hop position beyond the first. You will cause EVERY APRS stations in the state to TRANSMIT with maximum QRM and make many people very upset. Since most people do multiple things on 2 meters whenever their station transmits on APRS, they are totally blocked from 2m in the rest of their shack and sometimes their own TV's as well. But since this is only one packet every 30 minutes or so, must of us dont care. But when someone ELSE starts digipeating through EVERY HOME STATION in the state, it starts knocking out all kinds of stuff and is very very irritating. Do not do it. Bob >>> "Peter Devanney" <pdevanney at sympatico.ca> 7/22/04 7:38:30 AM >>> I am curious about path structure and precedence. For example, a popular path is RELAY, WIDE2-2 (or WIDE, WIDE) If the path was WIDE2-2,RELAY would the behaviour of the routing be the same of different? If I use an alias for a special event e.x. SAR. Does it matter where in the path statement the SAR is placed. 73 Peter VA3YOW _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Fixing HID problems on APRS!
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: NO-45
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
