[aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
Earl Needham needhame1 at plateautel.netMon Nov 1 06:45:08 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:59 AM 10/27/2004, Robert Bruninga wrote: > >>> wa7nwp at jnos.org 10/27/04 2:11:02 PM >>> > >> "This position arrived at FINDU via a path that is too long and > >> considered in appropriate on the APRS RF system." > > >Path is too long for where? A path that's too long for Seattle > >is appropriate and necessary in Montana. It's a regional problem. > >Then fix the regional problem by adding an IGate (trivial to do) >between every 3rd digi. With the mountains out there, I find >it hard to believe that it would not be easy to have an >IGate within 3 hops of every digi in the state.. Sorry I'm so late on this one, I was on the road for a while -- Bob, my area can have as many as five hops between USERS, much less IGATES. It's a simple matter (relatively speaking) to put up a digi on some isolated mountain, but it's nowhere near as simple to get an IGATE in an area where there are no users. 7 3 Earl Earl Needham, KD5XB, Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk
- Previous message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
