[aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
Tate KC7ZRU kc7zru at arrl.netMon Nov 1 06:11:15 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It's been awhile, but last I heard the only 'OK' way to do this was with something like a KPC3+ remotely operated. That way the control op could remote in and disable the station - even though it was a mobile tracker, the remote operator was the control op. Not the unlicensed volunteer who was driving that vehicle. But, since that only would disable the TNC (and hopefully the TX) and not the radio itself, there was still some question. Some advocated using one of the remote lines on the KPC3+ to fire a relay cutting power to the radio. However, assuming the radio had a time out timer, the consensus was that was 'OK'. As far as I know, that opinion has never been tested. But a dumb tracker with no remote ability and planning on an un-licensed person to turn it off? No way. Can't be legal by any stretch. And yes - whole heartedly agree, there's a major difference between a station, operated by a license holder using a tactical call sign - when his station is legally identified elsewhere(cwid, comments, etc) - and a non-ham having *ANY* control of a station. Two totally, un-related situations/discussions. The assumption that the only valid way to ID a packet TX is by the AX.25 originating station ID is bogus. The TX has to be ID'd - Part 97 never says where in the packet it has to be ID'd. Happens that tradition and AX.25 usually puts the ID in the originating station slot - but that's not a rule, that's a protocol. Now, I have to think it'd be OK for a non-ham to turn off a remotely controled station if for some reason the control op lost control and was able to contact said non-ham. That may be considered a 'convenience' to disable the radio before the time-out timer shut it down. But to rely on that, have that part of the 'remote operation' design? No way. Conversely, I'd assume that station either wouldn't or couldn't be turned back on by the non-ham 'helper'. Just another opinion to go with all the others... 73 - -- Tate KC7ZRU http://kc7zru.net GPG Public key available at http://kc7zru.net/kc7zru-pub.key . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBhdOCBWMVStWtSY4RAhLeAJ4tTNqYfz2TKcsSpFq8JXN5ydJLVQCgkddD l3lbpLPLNb6ecCvpcPILfD8= =2+7m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
