[aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgMon Nov 1 15:08:01 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>The assumption that the only valid way to ID a packet TX is by the AX.25 >originating station ID is bogus. The TX has to be ID'd - Part 97 never >says where in the packet it has to be ID'd. Happens that tradition and >AX.25 usually puts the ID in the originating station slot - but that's >not a rule, that's a protocol. I've got nothing against callsigns in the comment field. It's when you've got dumb trackers with tactical calls that are only transmitting a CW ID or other non-digipeated ID that I get annoyed. It's equivalent to getting on a state-wide linked repeater network, and switching to simplex every time you need to ID. Sure, you're ID'ing yourself on the air, but the majority of those who are receiving the rest of your transmissions won't get your ID. At least in that case someone can get on the air and ASK for your ID - with a dumb tracker, there's no way to tell who's responsible for it unless you happen to be in simplex range. Sure, maybe it's legal... I just think it's impolite, and bad operating practice. Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on expedition, but non ham?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
