[aprssig] Re: [OZAPRS] Windows UI-View Replacement - Development
apritch at blueyonder.co.uk
Mon Nov 15 13:13:17 CST 2004
I did wonder if upgrading visually XASTIR would be more productive. But what
we are talking about here is building a framework to allow people to pick
and mix there application and to promote developing of new components
without the need to recompile the core framework.
I always find anything in C a real pain in the backside to compile. Contrast
that with Java where all you need is the correct classpath defined.
73 - Andy, M0CYP
Telford - IO82SQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hamish Moffatt" <hamish at cloud.net.au>
To: <ozaprs at marconi.ics.mq.edu.au>
Cc: "'TAPR APRS Mailing List'" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org>;
<zlaprs at mail.nzart.org.nz>; <ui-view at yahoogroups.com>; "'ui-view admin
list'" <ui-admin at rogernet.net>; "'Scott Miller'" <scott at 3xf.com>;
<roger.bille at telia.com>; <w2ev at arrl.net>; <apritch at blueyonder.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] Windows UI-View Replacement - Development
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 12:13:40PM +1100, Darryl Smith wrote:
>> I have started a list on TAPR to look at a new Windows UI-View
>> as Roger decided that no more development would be done following his
>> The concept is to write a windows program and Architecture that will suit
>> third party development, like UI-View, but go far further.
> There IS an open-source APRS client already - XASTIR.
> Why put effort into creating another, instead of improving XASTIR?
> Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish at debian.org> <hamish at cloud.net.au>
More information about the aprssig