[aprssig] Fundamental APRS capacity
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Oct 4 13:48:57 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Fundamental APRS capacity
- Next message: [aprssig] Fundamental APRS capacity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> spider at rivcom.net 10/4/04 9:08:45 AM >>> >Earl, you have to consider way more than this ALOHA >concept when working with Radio. You have to take >in the fundamentals of Amateur Radio (actually any radio)... >something I think the ALOHA concept totally fails to do. > >I think Hams, need to go back and ask themselves just >what are the fundamental of operating Amateur Radio. >There, you will find the answers. That's an interesting comment. But I'd like to hear more about what you think might be lacking in the ALOHA concept as layed out that computes actual channel capacity by actual signals on the air, as heard. If you have any input into the algorithm, we will welcome adjustments until we get it right. But once we get it right, then it should become the golden rule for APRS so that we have a benchmark against which users and software can be good stewards of the network based on their actual live situation, not something published in a book or elsewhere.. Just letting anyone/everyone jam the channel as far as they can possibly go with no tools, or visualization as to the consequences of their actions is no way to run a reliable network. Yes, it makes for large pretty maps, but it makes reliable comnmunications impossible... de Wb4APR, Bob 73 Jim, WA6OFT _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Fundamental APRS capacity
- Next message: [aprssig] Fundamental APRS capacity
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
