[aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
Steve Dimse k4hg at tapr.orgWed Oct 27 15:16:03 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/27/04 at 9:50 AM Jason Winningham <jdw at eng.uah.edu> sent: >It also seems that the IGate would be the best place for any sort of >enforcement. This is not a good solution. First, you are talking about several authors and hundreds of users that need to upgrade their IGate software. Worse, until EVERY IGate operator is running new software, this could make the problem worse...a user in an area with new IGate might increase his path to reach a distant IGate running an unfiltered IGate. Even after all IGates were upgraded, this filtering without education is a poor solution. If the thesis that findU is the goal of the users is true, and a user running a bad path looks on findU and doesn't see himself, what will he do? From past experience, I can tell you many will email me...I get a dozen or so such emails a week already. I still look at each one, because one in a hundred is actually pointing out a problem with findU, but if I see no packets at all the only thing I can do is tell them to try to find someone local to help. This filtering method gives no education to the users, and no way for me or anyone else to help identify the problem. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
