[aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Oct 27 18:59:44 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> wa7nwp at jnos.org 10/27/04 2:11:02 PM >>> >> "This position arrived at FINDU via a path that is too long and >> considered in appropriate on the APRS RF system." >Path is too long for where? A path that's too long for Seattle >is appropriate and necessary in Montana. It's a regional problem. Then fix the regional problem by adding an IGate (trivial to do) between every 3rd digi. With the mountains out there, I find it hard to believe that it would not be easy to have an IGate within 3 hops of every digi in the state.. Remember, this does not restrict RF users. It only is a warning to users trying to use FINDU (typically blind trackers) who dont even see any on -air packets and are blind to the problems they are causing. So it is only the APRS-IS users that are being so warned.. Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
