[aprssig] BAD web page info on APRS
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Oct 28 12:34:54 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> kc7zru at arrl.net 10/28/04 12:46:55 AM >>> | But there are already HUNDREDS of these web references out there... | Some that still say WIDE7-7,TRACE7-7 is an appropriate path. >Sounds like time is *WAY* overdue for the SIG itself (maybe a new >Working Group/committee/volunteers?) to come up with a FAQ. I dont think the solution is just adding MORE advice. The thing to do is to get rid of all the BAD advice out there. If you find a page giving bad advice, then bring it to the author's attention and if you get no cooperation, bring it to the sig and lets debate it... It took us 5 years to un-do the damage by one page on how to set up DIGI's. We must be ever vigilant about bad or missleading WEB info... de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Worst Path of the Day
- Next message: [aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
