[aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK

[Phillip B. Pacier]

Rick Green wrote:

>Well, yes, I could work, but it will take much coordination to define the
>LANn-N areas, and travelling users will have to pay attention to where
>they are and keep adjusting their path accordingly.  
>  
>
Not if you take Bob's suggestion and program digis to respond to RELAY.  
Not necessarily all digis, but low-level digis or certain home 
stations.  This was the plan in Southern California years back, when 
most of the high-level digis dropped RELAY support all together.  
Several home stations in the area handle the RELAY traffic.

I agree that mobiles should be able to set one path and not have to 
worry about changing it.  That certainly would be a priority goal on my 
list.  Particulary for those running TT3s, etc., but even for those 
running Kenwoods - it's a pain to be constantly updating the path.

73
Phil - AD6NH
http://www.aprsca.net