[aprssig] Re: home RELAYs and paths
Chris Kantarjiev cak at dimebank.comWed Sep 8 19:42:50 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE:Macon APRS coverage
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Questions about paths
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I think if more stations would set up their home APRS stations as RELAYS, > coverage on 144.39 would increase dramatically without decreasing the > effectiveness of the network. Even with the large Digi's in this area, > there are still a lot of "dead" zones that would benefit from modest home > based RELAYs. Hear, hear! There are several (uh, let's see, at least 6) home stations between me and the nearest digipeater. Some of them, admittedly, are "just" TCP connected, based on the reports that findu shows. But several are not, and would/could produce a nice little fill-in footprint. I wonder if this is the case with many/most home stations? They don't actually have a radio attached? Is there an easy way to use the collected findu data to find out?
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE:Macon APRS coverage
- Next message: [aprssig] Re: Questions about paths
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
