[aprssig] RE: [OZAPRS] Re: SSID's
Bill Herrmann bherrman at spro.netMon Sep 20 03:38:45 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: [OZAPRS] Re: SSID's
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: [OZAPRS] Re: SSID's
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:38 AM 9/19/2004 -0400, Bob Bruninga wrote: > > I do not see why you would want to know that a station is a kenwood HT >Becasue it is a tracker that can RECEIVE messages. So? It isn't important to know that it's a Kenwood. It is important to know that it's message-capable. Let's not confuse capability with brand. (and don't forget that Kenwood makes non-APRS HTs) It doesn't matter whether it's a ham toting a Kenwood HT or a ham toting 2 HTs, a TNC, portable terminal device etc. (except that I'd say the latter is pretty dedicated to APRS...) What matters is whether I can send a message to that ham or not. >APRSdos displays all message capable statiosn in one >color and all others in a different color... Which is exactly what we want. Is that on the client capability chart? I know I've seen new (at least I hope they were new) APRS users sending messages to stations (digis, TinyTrak etc.) to stations that were identified per the APRS spec. as non-message-capable. (Actually, did it myself this morning, but it was 0430, we were on the road, and I knew the ham in question had receive capability. Turns out he hadn't switched it on yet...) Bill
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: [OZAPRS] Re: SSID's
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: [OZAPRS] Re: SSID's
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
