[aprssig] Re: [CA APRS] Re: Puzzled
bruninga at usna.edu
Tue Sep 21 19:02:37 CDT 2004
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, AE5PL Lists wrote:
> Some applications are not intolerant of those characters because of the
> packet mangling that has occurred over the years. Nowhere in the
> specification, to my knowledge, does it say that these are case
> intolerant. They are not case insensitive in NMEA strings.
> I believe UI-View, APRS+SA, javAPRS, and others sanity check these
> characters; so no, making them lower case is not backwards compatible.
The proposal is to make them case insensitive so that we can use that
bit. That still leaves a 127 out of 128 probability of a proper "sanity"
check. A very tiny price to pay for the added knowledge of whose
stations are manned versus those that are just burning up air time...
> Pete Loveall AE5PL
> mailto:pete at ae5pl.net
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob Bruninga
> > Posted At: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 6:22 PM
> > Subject: [aprssig] Re: [CA APRS] Re: Puzzled
> > > My guess is the lowercase 'n' in the position. Should be uppercase.
> > APRS programs are supposed to be tolerant of both cases for
> > the N/S byte. Hence a few years ago it was prposed that the
> > This was proposed for APRS a year or so ago and some APRS
> > programs have implemented it since all programs are supposed
> > to be indifferent to case in that byte anway. Thus it should
> > be fully backwards compatible.
> > But maybe we have found somne applications that are not
> > intolerant to that byte?
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
de WB4APR at amsat.org, Bob
PCsat WEB page http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/pcsat.html
ISS-APRS FAQ: http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/iss-faq.html
CUBESAT Designs http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/cubesat.html
APRS LIVE pages http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
APRS SATELLITES http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/astars.html
More information about the aprssig