[aprssig] APRS Alt-Input digis
Bob Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Sep 22 22:08:23 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] are ISS APRS satgates still needed?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Alt-Input digis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Annapolis MD has had an alternate 144.99 input now for several months to allow locals to get in without QRM from out of area clobbering them. The plan for an Alternate input digi is to encourage all fixed stations (who know what the local input freq is) to TX there and of course continue to receive on 144.39. This benefits all local users by spreading out the input contention load on 2 channels and letting mobiles have a better chance of getting in. There is one additional option that can benefit users of low power tracking devices. And that is to encourage the low power trackers to also operate on that input frequency. This way, their low power does not have to compete with 50W mobiles and all the other out-of area QRM also. I think with the proliferation of low power trackers, that it might be a good idea for all areas to consider adding the alternate low-power trcker input channel if they have some low power users in their area. In Annapolis, MD, we monitored 144.99 for a week and never heard anything, so we are using it becuase it has the neat advantage of being +600 from 144.39. Plesae if you do this, check out your local coordination of that freuqency and make sure it is not in use before you start using it. Good luck. de WB4APR at amsat.org, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] are ISS APRS satgates still needed?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Alt-Input digis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
