[aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel

[M J]

But isn't this already happening on your primary frequency now (ie: all of those Mic-E dataframes that I see on your findu system)?  They seem to be getting through ok, aren't they?  What is to lose in exploring a different channel that had infrastructure that was actually designed to address the specific environment of low-power transmit-only participants?
 
Asking from ignorance.
 
MJ (a non-ham list observer)


AE5PL Lists <HamLists at ametx.com> wrote:
I stand by my statement: it is bad
operating practice to transmit without listening first to prevent
intentional interference on a shared channel. It is bad data network
design to use a shared channel with no attempt to have a collision
avoidance method.

		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20040925/2d624a8b/attachment.htm