[aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel
J. Gary Bender, WS5N WS5N at mindspring.comMon Sep 27 17:14:35 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think you are ignoring the fact that DIGIpeaters are not real-time REpeaters. They are store and forward devices. It is SOP for packets, received from any source, to be stored on-board the digipeater until it is able to transmit on a clear channel. I doubt that the thought of digipeating on to .39 blindly was ever considered -- it just is not the way the machines work. The alt/input 144.99 proposal is a collision avoidance device in it's own right. It is a good and workable engineering compromise. It puts the most susceptible devices, and most likely to collide, on a channel with a much lighter load and no high power stations. One of the reasons I abandoned packet 10 years ago was because of the "hidden station" problem. APRS, because it took the limitations of a simplex network into account, works fine in that environment. I was taken aback when I saw deaf trackers so popular on APRS -- however, if the network could not handle them, they would not be so popular. This proposal gives the little trackers a much better chance. -- J. Gary Bender, WS5N Tijeras, New Mexico USA On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:11:35 -0500, Robbie - WA9INF wrote: > Gents, > > > I hope this never takes place on a wide scale. Special events, yes, > maybe it may work temporarily without too much detriment to the other > users. > > To advocate listening on one frequency and transmitting on another > without some kind of CD, is asking for some serious kind network > failures! > > I am not aware of any trackers or base stations or digipeaters that do > this now. If a tracker can not hear another station or CD, then it has > the right to transmit. If a digipeater, or base station, does not hear > another station, or NO CD, then it has the right to transmit.. > > But to just blatantly come up and digipeat a low power signal from > another frequency with out CD on 144.390, is "intentional interference". > It is not Aloha. Isn't Aloha "Transmit if you don't hear another > station" and the digipeaters or home RELAYs will sort it out? > > Even in a busy area like Chicago, I can track several 5 watt trackers > when they are on. > > I hope this can be sorted out before hundreds of stations jump on this > without fully understanding what may happen.. > > Robbie
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS low-power-local ALT input channel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
