[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduFri Apr 1 15:12:16 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 1, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Robbie - WA9INF wrote: > In all my experiences, which don't seem to make any sense any more, > our home station RELAYs with CallSign substitution, or MyAlias was > exactly that. A home RELAY hears the RELAY,WIDE2-2 and it goes out as > WA9INF*,WIDE2-2, which I still see all our Home stations RELAYs doing > even today! Right. My point (which I didn't make very well) was that this way we could eliminate RELAY from the path so that the big digi's don't digipeat it without the dupe suppression if they happen to hear it first (which I'm guessing happens most of the time), but we can still have home and fill-in digis where we need them. > Not many are actually needed with our big WIDEn-Ns, but there are a > few that do a good job. Mine is not needed, so I don't digipeat > anything.. We really don't have the problem around here, but it seems from discussions on the list that many areas could benefit from this attitude (don't run a digi if it isn't needed). My town is in a low area on the river, and the only digi is on a mountain 20 miles away. Unfortunately, it's not high enough to provide really good coverage, so we need some fill-in digis. I'm going to put one up at home. Even though it's just a rooftop antenna and HAAT is probably negative, it's better than nothing. After I get some experience running a digi and get some more appropriate hardware I'll start looking for a higher site for it. -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
