[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
bvjordi at bitsnvolts.com
Fri Apr 1 10:03:31 CST 2005
I misunderstood. Home stations were set to MYAlias = WIDE1-1 !!. Then no
Any case UIDigi "local digi" seems to do something similar but
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jordi Costa" <bvjordi at bitsnvolts.com>
To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at lists.tapr.org>
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu>
> To: <wa8lmf2 at aol.com>; <archer at eskimo.com>; <aprssig at lists.tapr.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 4:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
> > WOW! Am I missing something or is this the Holy Grail?
> In case of home stations configured as WIDE, they would digipeat packets
> previously digipeated for WIDE, high digis, too. Maybe they can increase
> channel load in some areas.
> In Europe some experiments were done around UIDigi "local digi" feature.
> such digipeater, if packets are first heard (not previously digipeated) it
> acts normally. Otherwise, if packets were previously digipeated, they are
> digipeated too, but digi chain is modified and cut in order to don't be
> further digipeated.
> Just another approach.
> Jordi - EA3CIU
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig