[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.comFri Apr 1 16:57:36 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Router/firewalls
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Wes Johnston wrote: > I think that the recommended path for mobiles should become: > WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 > or > WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3 > > Of course the sets the minimum number of hops to 3. The rule of thumb > would become never run WIDE1-1 after the first position. Oooh. Not good. I can see getting into a lot of problems with people not knowing that and trying that, in an effort to reduce their path. Instead what about using "RELAY1-1,WIDE2-2", and setting up houses and the hilltop digis to respond to that instead? Same concept as above but people can then still run "RELAY1-1,WIDE1-1" and not hurt anything. This is assuming that the hilltop digi's can do flooding protocol using any text string. Is that true, or does flooding protocol and specifically the dupe-checking only work for WIDEn-N and TRACEn-N? If they can't do these two: "WIDEn-N" and "RELAYn-N", then forget what I just said. -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Router/firewalls
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
