[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.comFri Apr 1 17:52:44 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Phillip B. Pacier wrote: > Fix the digipeaters as we have done in So. Cal and other places in the > country. > > Path = WIDE2-2 > > Done. > > Your proposals are far too confusing for 80+% of the APRS users. Once a "universal" path can be agreed upon as working for most cases, then the confusion factor will go way down. It's the getting there that's confusing. I can't see using WIDE2-2 as a path in my area. We'd get no boost from the home stations, and in my case it's essential. The areas you're talking about are probably quite different topographically and/or in terms of user-base. -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
