[aprssig] Re: Actually, the WIDE2-1,WIDE1-1 solution!
archer at eskimo.com
Fri Apr 1 14:14:27 CST 2005
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Wes Johnston wrote:
> I think I have it!
> A mobile station running W1-1,W2-2 gives 3 hops minimum becuase
> W1-1,W1-1 would cause every home station in town to TX.... But there is
> a real case for running less than 3 hops... If a mobile wants to limit
> his path to fewer than 3 hops, he can "dummy up" a reduced Wn-n count by
> using W2-1 instead of W2-2.
> I still think RELAY stations switching to W1-1 is a good idea.
Well, it appears to be a much better setup than running RELAY, even
with the possibility of people adding WIDE1-1 later in their path
every once in a while. That's a user education issue that can be
worked as the instances occur. It looks like we're out of other
options until a better TNC comes along.
> We could have three recommended paths for mobiles:
> W2-2 ->two hops off digis, if you can hit 1st digi direct
> W1-1,W2-1 ->one hop off house or digi, one more hop off digi
> W1-1,W2-2 ->one hop off house or digi, two more hops off digis
> In other words, if you want one hop, we have a solution.... WIDE1-1
> If you want two hops, we have a solution W1-1,W2-1
W2-1 One hop off digis
W2-2 Two hops off digis
W3-3 Three hops off digis
W4-4 Four hops off digis
> And.... W2-2 still works everywhere because all digipeaters will respond
> to it.
Yep! I'd be game for trying this scheme out. It's better than what
we're currently using with RELAY,WIDE2-2 in terms of dupes.
The only sticky point is that W1-1 can't be used in any but the
first slot. Digi-ned rules could enforce that, changing it into a
proper path if necessary.
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
More information about the aprssig