[aprssig] Question about the new STANDARD
John Johnson Ke4tzn at cox.netSat Apr 2 23:43:37 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] The final WIDE2-1,WIDE1-1 solution!
- Next message: [aprssig] Question about the new STANDARD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If I run WIDE2-2 at my house I can get into KB4TOH-10, K4ROK-10 and from time to time KD4PBS-3. So if I run WIDE2-2 all three digis can hear me so I would be creating QRM to the network. Somebody correct me if I am wrong. SO should I run K4ROK-10,WIDE2-2 or K4ROK-10,WIDE2-1? I think one of these would be better than just WIDE2-2. What I am getting to is if you can be heard by multiple digis should the user run their local digi as the first hop and then WIDE2-2 or WIDE2-1 OR WIDE1-1? I think if we put this in the new standard then we can add even more bandwidth for the network. Comments John Johnson KE4TZN -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20050402/43e840a9/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] The final WIDE2-1,WIDE1-1 solution!
- Next message: [aprssig] Question about the new STANDARD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
