[aprssig] Question about the new STANDARD

[John Johnson]

But if I keep it that way then this is what happens with three digis
that can hear me on the first hop.

WIDE2-2,K4ROK-10,WIDE2-1
WIDE2-2,KB4TOH-10,WIDE2-1
WIDE2-2,KD4PBS-3,WIDE2-1

SO now I have created 3 paths and 3 packets from the same path and that
is just the first hop. Does this help you understand what I am stating?
Maybe I was not clear when I first posted it.

If I run K4ROK-10,WIDE2-1 the it will only go out one more hop.

SO I have now created less packets by doing this. 
I am suggesting this for home stations only

-----Original Message-----
From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
[mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Wes Johnston
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 6:51 PM
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List; Ke4tzn at cox.net
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Question about the new STANDARD

I think this question is not so much about the changes in the network
being proposed, but more about day to day operation.

If your home station's outbound path was W2-2, why not keep it that
way?  The changes only affect mobile stations since they are the only
ones supposed to use RELAY (now WIDE1-1).

If you want to get out one tier, use k4rok-10 as your path, or WIDE2-1.
If you want to get out two tiers, use k4rok-10, WIDE2-1 as your path, or
generically WIDE2-2.

Home stations should never use WIDE1-1 in any portion of their path,
no one should use WIDE1-1 after the first hop.

Hope this is a help.
Wes

John Johnson wrote:

> If I run WIDE2-2 at my house I can get into KB4TOH-10, K4ROK-10 and
> from time to time KD4PBS-3. So if I run WIDE2-2 all three digis can
> hear me so I would be creating QRM to the network. Somebody correct me
> if I am wrong. SO should I run K4ROK-10,WIDE2-2 or K4ROK-10,WIDE2-1? I
> think one of these would be better than just WIDE2-2. What I am
> getting to is if you can be heard by multiple digis should the user
> run their local digi as the first hop and then WIDE2-2 or WIDE2-1 OR
> WIDE1-1? I think if we put this in the new standard then we can add
> even more bandwidth for the network.
>
>  
>
> Comments
>
>  
>
> John Johnson
>
> KE4TZN
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>  
>


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005